Shakespeare s King Lear And The Great Gatsby - 1346 Words

Personal gratification is commonplace in society, but the force to overcome it is not. In both Shakespeare’s King Lear, and Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, man’s natural psychological id is displayed by key characters, who are all morally corrupt. King Lear has 2 distinct sides who represent the id and superego, battling over justice in a kingdom centered around a weathered king. In The Great Gatsby, a commonplace working man by the name of Nick Carraway surrounds himself with friends who indulge themselves in luxury, influenced by the psychological id embedded deep within everyone. When observing family dynamics, both King Lear and The Great Gatsby reveal family interactions are driven primarily by the id, which is further supported when considering the presence of oedipal dynamics in both novels. In terms of narrative events, The Great Gatsby’s events are heavily influenced by the id, with little to no superego expressed. In contrast, while the bulk of Ki ng Lear’s storyline is similarly driven by the id, the superego plays a larger role in resisting the id’s unlawful desires, and this is exemplified through the triumph of the superego at the story’s end. The Great Gatsby depicts how life is hopelessly overridden by human’s natural id while King Lear demonstrates how even the smallest source of superego can combat the aggressive nature of the id present in life. In both King Lear and The Great Gatsby, the id is influential in most family interactions. For instance, King

Seymour Butts Free Essays

Hi my name is Seymour butts. My fathers name is moby dick. My favorite color is black. We will write a custom essay sample on Seymour Butts or any similar topic only for you Order Now My favorite food is pizza. I just got a new fish yesterday. I named him bluey. You want to know why, because he is blue. Today is was cloudy outside but it never rained. That’s a bumer. I rode in a hummer on Sunday. It was cool. I also went to the movies. I haven’t been to the movies in a long time. I went to the beach today. It was wavey. I have a dog named blacky. Because he is black. I come up with unique names. I had chicken stew for dinner tonight. That is my favorite thing to make. I also had a corn muffin with it. I just got done swimming in the pool. I do not have a pool. Fooled you. It is seventy six degrees in my house. That is very cold. It is twenty degrees outside. That is really hot. I cleaned my house today. It was very dirty. It took me all day to clean it. I love to clean the house. I don’t know how it got so dirty. Now the house does not have to be cleaned for another two years. I just dropped a glass plate and it shattered everywhere. Oh well. It was not my plate anyway. Well I hope this essay entertained you. It sure entertained me. All of this is true. That was a lie. I am just kidding. How to cite Seymour Butts, Papers

In My Short Life On This Planet I Have Come To Question Things That Ma Essay Example For Students

In My Short Life On This Planet I Have Come To Question Things That Ma Essay ny take upon blind faith. We all know that we must some day die; yet we continuously deny the forces at work inside ourselves, which want to search out the answers of what may or may not come after. It is far easier for humanity to accept that they will go to a safe haven and be rewarded for their lives with pleasures and fantasies of an unfathomable scale than to question the existence of a supposed omnipotent being. Yet, there are a few of us humans who tend to question the whys and wherefores that society puts forth to us. We question the existence of God, or the creation of mankind rather than blindly accepting faith-filled beliefs we may received from our parents as children. Perhaps it is because we live in a nation filled with many peoples of different beliefs whose Gods are all so varied and different that it is difficult to fathom that they are all the same divine being. It is also plausible that we just have a desire to quench the thirst for knowledge that lies deep within ourselves. As for myself, I cannot believe in a being which created a universe and a multitude of worlds in a rather short period of time then deigns to lower itself into becoming a puppet-master and pulling the strings of the Earth and all of the people therein. Since this paper touches upon many scientific terms, I feel that in order for the reader to correctly grasp the content I must first define three words: Theory, Law, and Hypothesis. The definitions will allow for a greater understanding of this essay and give us an even ground upon which to begin. Theory; (th?1e-r?, th?r1?) noun 1.a. Systematically organized knowledge applicable in a relatively wide variety of circumstances, especially a system of assumptions, accepted principles, and rules of procedure devised to analyze, predict, or otherwise explain the nature or behavior of a specified set of phenomena. b. Such knowledge or such a system. 2.An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture. Law; (l?) noun 12.a. A formulation describing a relationship observed to be invariable between or among phenomena for all cases in which the specified conditions are met: the law of gravity. b. A generalization based on consistent experience or results: the law of supply and demand; the law of averages. Hypothesis; (h?-p?th1?-s?s) noun 1.A tentative explanation that accounts for a set of facts and can be tested by further investigation; a theory. 2.Something taken to be true for the purpose of argument or investigation; an assumption. It is important that you thoroughly read the above definitions or you will be at a disadvantage if you do not. You will note that there are several different definitions to each word. I felt it was important to include the added definitive statement to theory because it shows the difference between a scientific theory and an everyday theory based upon conjecture. The additional definitions to law and hypothesis are both added for a further understanding of thes e words. The definition of creationism is somewhat more complex. One must start by saying that the belief in the creation of the universe given at the beginning of the Bible is literally true. Creationism is a belief based solely upon faith (which is a belief in and of itself). There are no scientific facts as a basis for this belief, solely conjectural theories and speculations. It is ingrained into our minds, as children that a belief of a force, or supernatural entity, which is all powerful and all knowing, is watching over us and taking care of our needs. Yet, to me, saying this very sort of thing is heretical in its very essence. To be so crude as to think that some being which created the universe itself and all things in it would take the time to care for each and every individual is incomprehensible. In practically all ancient cultures, the biblical included, the universe was thought of as an original chaos into which order had been introduced by a creative hand: This was th e essence of creation.1 In this statement alone we can see one of the major flaws of creationism. While science can prove without doubt the universe up to the first 20 milliseconds of existence, we cannot prove anything before that point at this time. The statement above, regarding creationism, suggests that there was no beginning, only chaos. Subsequently this creative hand structured the order of the universe out of chaos and applied physical laws to that chaos so it would form itself into motion and order. Yet, creationism as a whole does not touch base upon what came before the chaos. While science admits that there was a time in which different laws and order applied; creationism attempts to deny this existence by saying that there was always something. For if there was indeed a beginning and there was no God before this time, where did God come from? We can scientifically prove that there was a beginning. We cannot yet ascertain what was before this beginning, but we now know that there was one. To suggest that the universe has always existed is a mere myth today. Much like the myth that the world was once flat. Today, we take for granted that the world is indeed round, for have we not seen pictures from the space shuttle in orbit of the earth. Not to mention the multitude of orbital shots from satellites. Consequently we would consider it preposterous if someone attempted to tell us that the world is a flat surface. Yet, upon blind faith, some are content to believe that a creative hand structured this existence. Although the figures (Gods) differ from mythos to mythos, all the ancient stories intend simply to give a poetic accounting for cosmic origins.2 In the scientific community there is a well known and accepted theory known as the Big Bang Theory. Most people know of this theory because they were taught it in school. Yet it usually contradicted what their parents and pastors taught them in church. As a result, the Big Bang Theory was generally dis carded as something that intellectual minds which cannot exist upon the true faith alone, must accept as truth. The Big Bang Theory is stated in condensed form as follows. As the universe expanded, the residual radiation from the big bang would continue to cool, until now it should be a temperature of about 3 K (about -270? C/-454? F). This relic radiation was detected by radio astronomy in 1965, thereby providing what most astronomers consider to be confirmation of the big bang theory.3 In this statement we have our first of arguments over creationism by evolution. We have the beginnings of a proof that there was a time or rather, I should say, a point in time where there was indeed nothing. Many creationists will argue that the universe is too ordered; the path of the planets (which meant wanderers, or great wanderers in early Grecian society) is too ordered, too perfect. I will start by asking you to attempt to define perfect (as it existed at that time). In the creationalistic p oint of view, a person might write it off as the act of God. It was his divine will that moved the planets together in such a way as to be able to support life. Or you could ask the more worldly scientist who would explain to you about the Law of Probability, the Theory of Relativity, and show you lengthy mathematical equations dealing with Quantum and Theoretical Physics. In the end, you would likely have a headache of immense size, but come away with perhaps a better understanding of how the order of events, and the laws which created, ordered and structured the planets to exist as they do. Many creationism fanatics will also attempt to dissuade the argument of evolution by saying that the Big Bang is merely a theory. The only reply that the scientific world can refute this with is the fact that relativity and gravity, are also theories. This argument by creationists is obviously not in their favor. The creation of the universe by scientific means is a world-wide theory that many creationists refute simply because it goes against their beliefs. Yet to understand evolution to its fullest, we must further investigate life, or rather human life. We ask questions like: How did we evolve from amoebae?Are you trying to tell me that I evolved from an ape? If we are evolving in such a manner as described, why can we not see it daily? Since these are all very good questions, I will touch base upon them all. Approximately seven-hundred or eight-hundred million years ago life was first known on this planet in the form of single-celled organisms called procaryotes, not amoebae. Over time these unicellular organisms diversified into an array of adaptive types. Scientists hypothesize that many advanced cells (eucaryotes) may have evolved through amalgamation of a number of distinct simple cell types. Single-celled eucaryotes then developed complex modes of living and advanced types of reproduction that led to the appearance of multicellular plants and animals. The latter are first known from about seven-hundred million years ago, and their appearance implies that at least moderate levels of free atmospheric oxygen and a relatively predictable supply of food plants had been achieved.4 Through a long and drawn out process life eventually formed into that of mammals and dinosaurs. However, approximately sixty-five million years ago the dinosaur specie was completely eradicated (perhaps by way of natural selection), which left only mammals. Approximately two million years ago humanity began to show its evolution in the order of the universe. Humans originally belonged to an order of mammals, the primates, which existed before the dinosaurs became extinct. This development of descending from tree habitats to forest floors and eventually to more open country was associated with the development of many unique features of the human primate, such as erect posture and reduced canine teeth, which suggests new habits of feeding. However, while humanity did evol ve from a primate ancestor, it did not evolve directly from an ape-like specie. Humans as well as apes both evolved from the same primate specie, but each branched in different directions to become apes in one specie and humans in another specie. Yet, you ask that if this is the case, and humanity has evolved from primates in such a short period of time, why can we not see the evolutionary process taking place today? The answer is a simple one. I know of no human which has lived for two-million years. Which in and of itself is not a very valid argument for this case, but nevertheless a substantial point at any rate. However, if we were to be more objective about the process of human evolution we would see that in the life span of the earth we are still a relatively young race. Dinosaurs, for example, inhabited this planet for over one-hundred-thirty-five million years. In relative view of this information, we can see that humans have only been in existence for approximately 1/60th o f the time that dinosaurs existed. With this in mind, we can further grasp that the process of evolution is a very slow process which requires an almost incomprehensible scale of time to our limited lifespans. While I realize that many points, and beliefs were not touched upon in this essay I did attempt to cover as much ground as possible in as short a space as possible. It is painfully clear to me that an existence based upon blind faith is no longer an acceptable tradition. The ideas of creationism are far outweighed by the Laws and Theories of evolution. While there are understandably a great many men who have spent a vast amount of time in scribing the Bible, we must realize that they were indeed men, not Gods and the bible is, actually, only a book. To believe the contents of that book completely, one must have unwavering faith in the validity of its concepts and the precepts upon which its religion is based. One of the striking and perhaps most intriguing points of interest t hat I have stumbled upon is the lack of education of creationism in schools. If the point was so very valid and without skeptical doubt, then why is it not being taught to our children? I understand the idea of separation between church and state, and the fact that the school is very much a part of state. Yet it seems to me that if the idea is a basic building block in todays society then why not teach this to the young? Why is it that we only teach evolution if it is so unbelievable? The simple fact of the matter is that we have evidence and supporting cases in science today which makes the very idea of creationism redundant to teach, as well as a contradicting view of evolution which could possibly confuse those of a younger age. There are many religions in the world upon which the bible are based, and the ones which espouse creationism are but a few. Being a western culture we tend to forget this. In summary I believe that evolution is the only plausible of these two theories whi ch is acceptable to the current state of humanity. In closing I leave you with a simple, yet disturbing statement that a great man once told me: it is not what you believe; its what you can prove.5 Creationism is based upon belief; evolution is based upon scientific proof. ___________________________ 1Creation, Microsoftr Encartar 96 Encyclopedia. c 1993-1995 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. c Funk ; Wagnalls Corporation. All rights reserved. 2Creation, Microsoftr Encartar 96 Encyclopedia. c 1993-1995 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. c Funk ; Wagnalls Corporation. All rights reserved. 3Cosmology, Microsoftr Encartar 96 Encyclopedia. c 1993-1995 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. c Funk ; Wagnalls Corporation. All rights reserved. 4Evolution, Microsoftr Encartar 96 Encyclopedia. c 1993-1995 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. c Funk ; Wagnalls Corporation. All rights reserved. 5 Personal Environmental Ethics Essay

Business Law in Canada for Vicarious Liability †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Business Law in Canada Vicarious Liability. Answer: Introduction In order to ensure that clients are protected by businesses, their is the need to ensure that there is a clear structure that has been put in place to guarantee the same. Vicarious liability is one of the doctrines that has been put in place in order to ensure that mistakes that are made by employees while in the course of their duty are placed on the businesses. This ensures that employers are able to manage their employee effectively in order to ensure that no mistakes are realized as a result of the same. Vicarious liability does not expose businesses to too much liability. This is because employers must be able to bear the burden of the problems that they create. In this case therefore, it is essential to understand that as an employer one should be able to bear the responsibility of what should happen to their clients as a result of their employees actions (Nickels et al., 2010). Employees are part of the business and any harm that they cause during their delivery of services, businesses must be able to take the responsibility of the same. One of the arguments that can be adopted in order to try and understand the stand id whereby the employer takes credit for the good deeds of the employee. It is important to understand that whenever a client performs well the business benefits as a result of profits and good reputation that come with the same. Therefore, the same should be applied when employees act in a negligent manner. The employer must understand that by employing a person the y are taking risk and in any case there is any liability that arises as a result of the employees the same should be transferred to them. The other reason as to why vicarious liability should not be viewed as a way of placing too much liability on businesses is the fact that it places incentives to employers during recruitment and training of employees (Yates Clarke, 2002). Employers must be able to ensure that all their employees are trained to the required standards in order to prevent any harm that may be caused by them to clients. In the Tradif v. Wiebe case, the bouncer had not been trained on how to handle clients in case a conflict arose. It is important to note that this was a failure on the managements part which would eventually resonate as a result of events that would later occur. It is important to note that the liability should lie on the hotels management due to the placing their clients at risk of being harmed as a result of the unprofessional behavior by their boun cers. The other reason as to why the pressure placed on businesses as a result of vicarious liability is not too much for them to handle is due to the fact that they have deeper pockets as compared to the employees. Most of the employees just depend on their salaries while the businesses they work for rake in millions in terms of profit. Therefore, in order to ensure that the party that suffers damages is reinstated to their initial position, the employer is at a better position to reimburse the same. It is important to understand that in some situations it is not the employers failure but as a reason to that of the employee (Yates, 2012). Therefore, it is important for the courts to decide in which cases that the liability lays with the employer or rather the employee. In any case the failure is as a result of the employees negligence it is wise that they should pay for the damages themselves. However, if the failure is a result of the employers negligence then it is wise that the same is reimbursed by them. A good case is whereby the management did not train the bouncer on how to handle drunken customers. The hotels management is tasked with ensuring that all its employees are of the highest professional conduct before hiring this in order to ensure that the clients are safe forms any life- threatening situations (Bowal Bontorin, 2014). Therefore the vicarious liability in this case should be transferred to the hotel, since in reference to the evidence presented so far it shows that the hotels management should be held liable of damage caused. It is important to understand that is far as bouncers are concerned they just have the same rights as ordinary citizens (Fudge et al., 2003). Therefore, they should understand that they are not allowed to break thelaw and claim to be undertaking their duties. As far as thelaw goes, bouncers are only required to request one to leave the club in any case they become rowdy. Therefore, in any case the bouncer injures a person, they should be able to suffer the consequences just like any other private citizens. However bouncers can claim self- defense in any case one becomes rowdy and threatens to harm them. It must also be noted that if one breaks thelaw sometimes the employer should not always for their employees criminal acts if they are doing the same for their self- interests. As the court, stated in the case of Tradif v. Wiebe the bouncer was just trying to impress his employer and therefore working outside the mandate of his duties which is to request the customer out and went ahea d to punch him causing injury. Conclusion As it has been noted above, vicarious liability does not place too much liability to businesses. It is essential for employers to ensure that their employees effectively handle their clients in order to minimize any risk that may be imminent. It must also be understood that bouncers do not have equal power to police officers. Therefore, they should not be allowed to harass people while on duty to a point whereby damage is realized. This should be blamed on the employer who should be able to train their employees on how to behave and handle clients. References Nickels, W. G., McHugh, J. M., McHugh, S. M., Cossa, R., Sproule, B. (2010). Understanding Canadian Business.McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto, ON. Yates, R. A. (2012).Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business. Pearson Education Canada. Fudge, J., Tucker, E., Vosko, L. F. (2003). Employee or Independent Contractor-Charting the Legal Significance of the Distinction in Canada.Canadian Lab. Emp. LJ,10, 193. Yates, R., Bereznicki-Korol, T., Clarke, T. (2002).Businesslaw in Canada. Scarborough, Ont.: Prentice Hall. Tardif v.Wiebe 1996 Carswell B.C. 2438(B.C.S.C.) Bowal, P., Bontorin, L. (2014). Vicarious Liability: The Legal Responsibility of Employers.

Sample Disadvantaged Essay - How to Write a Sample Disadvantaged Essay

Sample Disadvantaged Essay - How to Write a Sample Disadvantaged EssayIf you're looking for a sample of a disadvantaged essay, then you should consider writing an Amcas essay. These letters are sent in place of school interviews, which are often tedious. Often the interview is required in place of your high school diploma, which many students do not have.In order to write an Amcas essay, you will need to know what an Amcas letter is and how to write one. An Amcas essay is different from a typical academic essay, because it can only be completed by the entire class.For some, writing an essay for this situation can be a very common challenge. It is not easy to write a competitive essay and impress your fellow classmates, so being able to know the kind of person you are, before starting out, is something that you should take into consideration.One of the best ways to learn how to write an Amcas essay is to look at those who have already achieved their goal. There are a lot of great Amca s essays that have been written by people who were able to get through college. For instance, your personal tutor or the secretary of your local school will have some great letters. Or, even if you're a very good student, you may not be able to get into your college or university because of other circumstances.Fortunately, there are people that write Amcas letters, which can help you learn how to write one. These people can be your friends, or people who work in educational institutions. They can guide you through the whole process, which can save you a lot of time and money.The truth is, many people do not really want to write a paper, but they have no one to recommend to them. They do not know where to go to find a good resource for writing an Amcas essay. So, I recommend that you do not give up too soon.The best way to find a great resource for writing one is to ask for advice. You can ask your friend or your local representative, or you can even get an introduction from your sch ool's English department. By getting more information, you will be able to improve your skills and your chances of finding the right resource.Many people who have written an Amcas essay, know that it can be very tough. However, with the help of resources, like an Amcas guide, you can get through your first Amcas essay with ease.

Assassination Of Jfk Essays (406 words) - Lee Harvey Oswald

Assassination Of Jfk JAKE Lee Harvey Oswald On November 22, 1963 JFK was assassinated. Though to this day it is unknown weather the accused killer Oswald, acted alone or was a patsy as he claimed. Lee Harvey Oswald was the perfect fall guy for such a conspiracy. He was a former US marine that defected to USSR. He was a Marxist with communist believes. He did support Kennedy's view on Cuba and was said to have handed out pro Castro propaganda. Oswald may have not supported the President, he may have even wanted him dead. Though he was not capable of the assassination alone. Oswald worked in the Book Depository building where the shots were allegedly fired from. I believe it would have been impossible for Oswald to have killed the president, for a number of reasons. Oswald was right handed the Italian Rifle he was said to have used was set up for someone that was left handed. From the window he was supposedly perched at their was a huge tree blocking his vision. Oswald was also said to be a very poor shot when he was in the Marines. Whoever the gunmen were, they fired their five to six shots very accurately. The fatal head wound shown the presidents head to have moved back and to left indicating that the shot came from the front. Oswald was behind the president and could not have inflicted that wound. Moments prior to the shooting Oswald was on the second floor of the building drinking a Coke. When he was confronted in the building after the shooting he was said to have been calm and collective. You would think after someone had committed the murder of the century they would be a little more tense. Oswald did not appear to be tense at all. He exited the building from the front door of the building. If he had committed the murder he would probably have escaped from the building through a different door. Oswald was a mere pawn in the conspiracy and the assassination of JFK. He was not the trigger man just a mere patsy as he said. Their are thousands of files that have been reviewed by two committees since the assassination. One of them the Warren commission believed that Oswald was the lone assassin. The other The house Select Committee believes if Oswald did do it than he did not act alone. They believed a conspiracy was probable. History Reports

FAMILIAL INFLUENCE ON CHILDHOOD OBESITY Essays

FAMILIAL INFLUENCE ON CHILDHOOD OBESITY Essays FAMILIAL INFLUENCE ON CHILDHOOD OBESITY Essay FAMILIAL INFLUENCE ON CHILDHOOD OBESITY Essay FAMILIAL INFLUENCE ON CHILDHOOD OBESITY Scope Nature of the Problem The children population currently struggling with obesity has massively expanded, representing a huge health care burden both at present and in the future. The extent of the epidemic is worsened because it is a critical risk factor for other diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, musculoskeletal disorders, cancer and diabetes. Upwards of 17% of adolescents and children in the United States, suffer from obesity, representing more than 12.5 million patients (World Health Organization, 2012). These represents a near 300% increase in the levels since 1980, with considerable ethnic and racial disparities in the prevalence rates, with male Hispanics and non-Hispanic black girls being the worst affected population groups. Similar trends are evident elsewhere in the world, with the World Health Organization (WHO) estimating that upwards 40 million children across the world are either overweight or obese. : Research Hypothesis Family behaviors and attitudes are important in whether or not children become overweight or obese Justification There is a growing body of theoretical, scientific evidence indicating that children assimilate their family and parents health philosophies. They engage in activities and eat foods that their families allow, encourage or provide them with, and refrain from those that are forbidden. This influence of families and parents on childrens eating and exercise habits is critical in the development of disease, while at once building lasting habits that prevent or predispose them to obesity or high body weight (Austin, 2011). With the establishment of empirical evidence to back up the theoretical models, this research findings will help to create and impetus for the development better parental attitudes and skills, which will ultimately lead to the reduction of theoverall disease burden and the overall health care costs facing populations and governments. Potential family-based interventions/treatments can be developed with the establishment of firm evidence of family environments on the poss ibility of obesity development. In addition, if the research hypothesis can lead to the prevention of incidental diseases associated with childhood obesity, while at once boosting the productivity of the future generations. Methodology The research design will use both secondary and primary data. The secondary data would comprise of peer-reviewed journal and book sources on childhood obesity causes, preventive methods and the possible predisposition of children due to familial factors (Austin, 2011). The primary data would be obtained from a cross-sectional sample of 400 children aged between 6 and 13. The sample would comprise (i) 100 Hispanics (ii) 100 Blacks (iii) 100 Whites and (iv) Minority groups. Half of the respondents must be (i) obese (ii) overweight. The research staff would go to schools and hospitals, and request parents and the children to participate in the study. As many as 700 possible participants would be selected, from whom a random sample of 450 would be selected to participate in the study. Respondents would complete research questionnaires sent by post, email or by telephone interviews based on the questionnaire, with information includingtheir diet, eating habits, parental attitudes towards eating and exercise, knowledge of obesity and the number of times that food is cooked in the home (Kothari, 2009). Others would include the children body mass index, maternal depression, family functioning and self-esteem etc. Once questionnaires are completed, they will be checked for completeness and correctness, before the final random sample of 400 is selected for coding, and analysis. Data would be analyzed by a specialized statistical computer software, SPSS and varied reports would be provided. Initial Findings The causes of obesity, a non-communicable and perfectly preventable disease, are well known and include excessive intake of high energy and sugar foods, low vegetables intake and lack adequate physical activity. Genetic predisposition, family demographics, parenting practices, increasing sedentary lifestyles due to computer use and television viewing etc, increasing consumerism and hectic family schedules have equally been identified as (Delahanty, et al., 2012). Other causal factors include the emergence of the fast foods industry, which is almost solely responsible for the rise in high-fat foods across the world.It is however evident that proper parenting and control can limit these risk factors, effectively making the heightened rates of obesity a direct consequence of the failure in parenting (Austin, 2011). According to the ecosystems model, the relationships among families, individuals, society, institutions and psychosocial groups interactions have a considerable effect on the functioning and behavior. On the other hand, another theoretical model, the ecological model asserts that family dynamics are critical in whether or not children develop weight problems or obesity. This possibility is determined by food choices, which are influenced by the family demographic characteristics (HU, 2011). Families in which both parents worked and single parent families were more likely to eat fast foods, compared to other families, which in turn influence the eating habits of children. In addition, low income families vegetable consumption by as much as 22%, as do dual worker families (Delahanty, et al., 2012). Other factors including the parents beliefs and attitudes about the nutritional and exercise needs of the children impact the body weight of the children. References Austin, B. (2011). [Commentary on] The Blind Spot in the Drive for Childhood Obesity Prevention: Bringing Eating Disorders Prevention Into Focus as a Public Health Priority. American Journal of Public Health, Jun2011, Vol. 101 Issue 6 . Delahanty, L. M., Pan, Q., Jablonski, ,. K., Watson, C., McCaffery, J., Kahn, S., et al. (2012). Genetic Predictors of Weight Loss and Weight Regain After Intensive Lifestyle Modification, Metformin Treatment, or Standard Care in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care , vol. 35 no. 2 363-366. HU, F. (2011). Globalization of diabetes: the role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. diabetes lifestyle, Harvard School of Public Health, in PubMed . Kothari, D. C. (2009). Research methodology: methods and techniques. New York: New Age International. Mazzeo, D., Arens, S., Germeroth, C., Hein, H. (2012). Stopping childhood obesity before it begins. Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 93 Issue 7 , , p10-15. World Health Organization. (2012, May 17). Obesity and overweight. Retrieved June 3, 2012, from www.who.org: who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/